Children’s Video Puzzle Interaction: The Effects of Age, Experience, Object Size, Screen Size and Task-Fit

  • Liew Tze Hui
  • Lau Siong Hoe
  • Hishamuddin Ismail

Abstract

The size of an object and screen is of critical importance for children to interact successfully with video puzzles.  Therefore, it is an urgent call for us to understand the factors affecting the object’s size, screen size and task-fit with actual interaction experience with a video puzzle, in a child-computer interaction. This study aimed to fill this gap by investigating the determinants of the actual usage experience of video puzzle and its moderators, namely through age and experience. This paper examined the moderating roles of age and experience in the relationship between the determinants (object size, screen size and task-fit) and the actual usage of video puzzle experience (N = 195, 3–6 years). A linear regression was conducted to understand the moderating role of the moderators. The results showed that the actual interaction experience with a video puzzle was determined by task-fit, moderated by age and experience.  Besides, the result also revealed that the role of the object’s size with the actual interaction experience with a video puzzle was moderated by experience. From the results, no moderating effect was found between the screen’s size and the actual interaction experience with a video puzzle for both age and experience. This finding indicated that in today’s child-computer interaction, the size of the screen is no longer an important factor to consider, regardless of age and experience. Furthermore, the result has shown that there is a moderating effect by experience between the object’s size and the actual interaction experience with the video puzzle.  The result has suggested that the experience is crucially important in effecting pre-school children’s actual interaction experience with a video puzzle. Concerning the complexity of interaction, pre-school children were having difficulties to accurately tab on the target of interaction during their interaction with a video puzzle through the use of a multi-touch screen, but with more interaction experience, the accuracy of targeting was increased accordingly.

References

Anthony, L. (2019). Physical dimensions of children's touchscreen interactions: Lessons from five years of study on the MTAGIC project, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 128, 16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.02.005.
Aziz, N. A. A. (2013). Children’s interaction with tablet applications: gestures and interface design, International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 2(3), 447-450.
Chae, M. Kim, J. (2004). Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(3), 165-181.
Crescenzi, L., Jewitt, C. & Price, S. (2014). The role of touch in preschool children’s learning using iPad versus paper interaction. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 37 (2), 86-95. ISSN 1038-1562.
Cristia, A., & Seidl, A. (2015) Parental Reports on Touch Screen Use in Early Childhood. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0128338. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128338.
Davis, J. (2012). Why Puzzles Are So Important For Kids Learning?. Learning 4 Kids. https://www.learning4kids.net/2012/02/21/why-are-puzzles-so-good-for-kids-learning/.
Dimitrios, R, Nikolaos, T, Jesper, K & Mikael, S. (2013). Does size matter? Investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users’ perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency. MobileHCI '13: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, August 2013 Pages 127–136. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493204.
Goodhue, D. L. & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly 1995, 19(2), 213-236.
ISO 9241-11:2018, Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts). Doi: https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html.
Jones, M., Buchanan, G., & Thimbleby, H. (2003). Improving web search on small screen devices. Interacting with Computers 15(4), 479-495.
Kim, K.J., Sundar, S.S., & Park, E. (2011). The effect of Screen-Size and Communication Modality on Psychology of Mobile Device Users. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press, 1207-1212.
Lian, J. W. & Yen, D. C. (2014). Online Shopping Drivers and Barriers for Older Adults: Age and Gender Differences, Computers in Human Behavior, 37 (August), 133–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.028.
Magsamen-Conrad, K., Upadhyaya, S., Joa, C. Y., & Dowd, J. (2015). Bridging the Divide: Using UTAUT to predict multigenerational tablet adoption practices. Computer Human Behavior, 50, 186–196. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.032.
Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S., & Allan, G. (2008). The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software, 3(4), 51-61.
Metaxas, G., Metin, B., Schneider, J., Shapiro, G. Zhou, W. and Markopoulos, P. (2005). SCORPIODROME: An exploration in mixed reality social gaming for children. International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology. ACE 2005, Valencia, Spain, June 15-15, 2005.
Motti, L. G., Vigouroux, N., & Gorce, P. (2014). Design of a social game for older users using touchscreen devices and observations from an exploratory study. in UAHCI, HCII 2014, Part III 8 (ed. C. Stephanidis and M. Antona), 69–78 (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014). Doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07446-7_7.
Parameswaran, S., Kishore, R., Li, P. (2015). Within-study measurement invariance of the UTAUT instrument: An assessment with user technology engagement variables. Information Management. 52, 317–336. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.12.007.
Spaho, A. (2016). Internet Banking Adoption and Usage in Albania : An Empirical Study, (June 2014). Journal of Educational and Social Research, Vol. 4 No.4, 460-465. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n4p460.
Spivey Angela. (2010). Lose Sleep, Gain Weight: Another Piece of the Obesity Puzzle. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(1): A28–A33. doi: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831987/.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly. 19, 561–570.
Tsai, W. & Lee, C. (2009). A study on the icon feedback types of small touch screen for the elderly. Univers. Access Human-Computer Interact., 422–431. Doi: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_46.
Tumbokon, R. (2019). Smartphone and Tablet Screen Time: Good or Bad for Kids?. Raise Smart Kid. Doi: https://www.raisesmartkid.com/all-ages/1-articles/smartphone-and-tablet-screen-time-good-or-bad-for-kids.
Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. J. Entrepreneur Information Management. 28, 443–488. Doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088.
Woodward, J., Shaw, A., Aloba, A., Jain, A., Ruiz, J., & Anthony, L. (2017). Tablets, tabletops, and smartphones: cross-platform comparisons of children’s touchscreen interactions. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI), 5–14, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136755.3136762.
Published
2020-07-31
How to Cite
TZE HUI, Liew; SIONG HOE, Lau; ISMAIL, Hishamuddin. Children’s Video Puzzle Interaction: The Effects of Age, Experience, Object Size, Screen Size and Task-Fit. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 97-115, july 2020. Available at: <http://myjms.moe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/10228>. Date accessed: 11 aug. 2020.
Section
Articles